atrax29

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Crafting flaw? #6618

    atrax29
    Participant
    0

    Yes, it’s me being biased in saying patient touch should only be used once.. not six times.

    in reply to: Crafting flaw? #6614

    atrax29
    Participant
    0

    I didn’t have logs enabled, so I’ll have to wait till next time:

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Crafting flaw? #6613

    atrax29
    Participant
    0

    Suceeding in 2 patient touches in a row is what 64% chance? With a penalty of losing half your stacks when it fails, that’s far worse than hasty touch. Should only use it once, just like any online solver does. The bot will literally not stop until is succceeds two in a row (yes it’s miqo). And I never said it will always be like that. But it shouldn’t even happen. Why bring up hasty touch to compare anyway? There’s a reason why ppl avoid it like the plague.

    in reply to: Crafting flaw? #6611

    atrax29
    Participant
    0

    An action that’s going to prevent whats happening, which is blowing all my duration on failing patient touch over and over again (in screenshot)? I have not seen a macro yet that attempts this (using it twice back to back), for this reason. There’s too much rng involved. I can go a while without failing one, then all of the sudden I could fail 2-4 in a row. Failing patient touch, you lose half your inner quiet stacks, it’s a huge penalty.

    But on that subject, I’ve been using miqo since 4.1. I know how important it is to have all actions on your bar.

    in reply to: Ephemeral Nodes #6273

    atrax29
    Participant
    0

    So, my issue is, when these ephemeral nodes pop, the items are always in a diff slot. Am I just supposed to manually get these?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)