Forum › Forums › Grids and Presets › Request: Stormblood – Ephemeral Nodes Scenario
This topic contains 48 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by Lyfox 6 years, 4 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 19, 2017 at 3:12 pm #5072
Here is an updated Ephemeral_SB profile. I fixed a few issues. Dying while gathering twincoon, getting stuck at the house of the fierce and it now gathers fire crystals instead of durium ore. As far as the comments as to why I don’t gather dusklight sands, there is literally zero profit on my server for them. So I prefer to guide the bot to do something different during those times. I actually did make a profile that includes them but scrapped it as it was bad time investment. The crystals in dusklight areas aren’t even worth anything. Anyhow here is the updated profile.
What are your key mappings for this?
August 21, 2017 at 12:15 pm #5077September 12, 2017 at 6:08 pm #5267September 25, 2017 at 5:37 am #5346October 16, 2017 at 1:50 am #5493October 16, 2017 at 6:16 am #5495October 20, 2017 at 7:28 pm #5523I seem to have fixed it. Other than the occasional “I can’t find ____” when teleporting.
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.November 10, 2017 at 11:32 pm #5784November 19, 2017 at 9:07 pm #5835Still a few kinks to work out such as having workUntil / workFor in use rather than relying on chapter repeats to time out correctly. Reformatted the older scenario to use repeatChapter function. Took out a few seemingly unnecessary commands to hasten chapter execution. Updated the rotation to use less GP and more often than not, get better collectability. Collectability Before: range was 300-550ish Now: range is 400-600 with up to 2 gathers per node. Also instituted the gatherTouch for faster ephemeral gathering. R is bound to a cordial. HQ would be best, but not required. If anyone can get the workFor command to work well with this layout, please share. That is the only thing I feel is holding this scenario back in regards to staying on time and executing chapter after chapter without accidentally waiting a whole 24 in game hours for the afkUntil command to trigger due to being late to the execution by a few in game mins. Thanks a lot to everyone that posted this scenario before me!
Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.November 27, 2017 at 3:24 am #5917November 27, 2017 at 3:40 am #5918Yea and its super easy to make a few tweaks with Miqo editor to make it unique. Just invest a few minutes of your time to customize your navroutes.
Besides not all crystals are of the same price. Its a good idea to remove chapters with ice / earth / whatever is cheap on your server and do something else in that time. Even a plain return() + afkUntil() makes you look a lot wiser. You can also mix it with heavensward ephemerals to focus on more profitable crystals.
November 27, 2017 at 4:35 am #5919April 13, 2018 at 7:09 am #6763Still a few kinks to work out such as having workUntil / workFor in use rather than relying on chapter repeats to time out correctly. Reformatted the older scenario to use repeatChapter function. Took out a few seemingly unnecessary commands to hasten chapter execution. Updated the rotation to use less GP and more often than not, get better collectability. Collectability Before: range was 300-550ish Now: range is 400-600 with up to 2 gathers per node. Also instituted the gatherTouch for faster ephemeral gathering. R is bound to a cordial. HQ would be best, but not required. If anyone can get the workFor command to work well with this layout, please share. That is the only thing I feel is holding this scenario back in regards to staying on time and executing chapter after chapter without accidentally waiting a whole 24 in game hours for the afkUntil command to trigger due to being late to the execution by a few in game mins. Thanks a lot to everyone that posted this scenario before me!
Hello, i didn’t understand something. Everything works great but only on Schorl it didnt use Collect. The macro use collect btw but it didnt works. It just hit the node everytime. I’ve compared the macro with others from the scenario and didnt notice something different.
April 17, 2018 at 4:16 am #6778April 29, 2018 at 8:54 pm #6836 -
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.